Considering response options
I think we should ask what information the user is looking for: a translation, summary, context, analysis of tactics, or contract details related to Vanoli. Given the codex CLI environment, I don’t need shell commands, so a concise response would be best. I can provide a quick overview of Paolo Vanoli, including his coaching background and work with Antonio Conte at various clubs and the Italian national team. I might also mention his time at Spartak Moscow.Providing context on Vanoli
I see that Vanoli joined Venezia in late 2022 and achieved promotion by 2024. If the user mentions Fiorentina, we can share general background without contradicting. I can present some bullet points including his background, coaching history with Spartak Moscow, and tactical style, which focuses on formation and wingbacks. I want to avoid inaccuracies by sticking to known players and suggesting their benefits. I’ll ask the user what they need, whether it’s a translation, background, or analysis.
好消息确认了。要不要我补点背景/解读？可以选一项或多项：
- 教练名片：瓦诺利过往履历、成绩与奖项 
- 战术画像：常用阵型、压迫与反击思路、定位球特点
- 阵容适配：佛罗伦萨现有人脚的受益点与短板
- 引援建议：哪几个位置最可能成为优先补强
- 目标评估：“短约+1年选项”对赛季目标与风险的意味
先给一句话简评：
- “短约+选项”是俱乐部降低不确定性的常见做法；瓦诺利以三后卫、翼卫推进、快速反抢和定位球见长，若给到合适的翼卫和能回撤串联的前场配置，短期内有望把防守稳定性与攻防转换效率拉起来。